Jose Simao Antunes do Carmo
University of Coimbra, Portugal
Title: Past behaviors and future coastal defense options
Biography
Biography: Jose Simao Antunes do Carmo
Abstract
In the (recent) past, coastal works were generally of an engineering nature. The concept in force until the 1980s was to ensure safety at any cost. The issues were addressed and solved in an essentially physical context. At that time, an engineer took full responsibility for analyzing the coastal issue, producing the project, conducting the work and supervising its implementation. On the other hand, much of the engineering used in coastal projects was based on experience which , in combination with engineering practice, was a real rule of thumb. In this context, the combined effects of flood defences, protection of urban fronts, protection of heritage and reclamation of degraded areas have resulted in many kilometres of sea banks, sea walls and groin fields. It is known that hard engineering structures can be highly effective when used properly, but they can be overcome by events beyond their design capacity. Such structural measures also transfer the risk of erosion and possible flooding, reducing the risk in one location but increasing the risk in another. Moreover, investment and monitoring costs are high and monitoring is constantly required, and the beach aesthetics are lost. Meanwhile, following the evolution of computing means, it became possible to use increasingly sophisticated mathematical models to solve increasingly complex problems, allowing the generalization of the essentially ad hoc practices of engineering projects. Scientifically developed hydrodynamic theories were adopted and adapted to the basic principles of physics that could be used to generalize traditional practices. On the other hand, today, concerns are no longer limited to safety: lifestyle and quality of life have become essential ingredients. Other aspects of the project have also become important, such as environmental impact, attractiveness and sustainability. We may learn from the past that most adaptation measures have been more reactive than proactive. Today we know that adopting a passive attitude and simply reacting to events often leads to worse and more expensive solutions.